Product safety engineers, sometimes called product compliance engineers, develop and conduct tests to make sure that various products are safe and comply with industry or government safety regulations. These engineers work on a wide range of products, from nuclear submarine reactors and robotics to cell phones and computer systems.

What is the role of product safety?

Primary Responsibilities Investigate accidents and injuries related to product and issue recalls if necessary. Construct precautionary instructions on label. Oversee manufacturing process of product. Analyze chemical features to ensure nothing is hazardous.

What is the highest salary of safety engineer?

What is the highest salary for a Safety Engineer in India? Highest salary that a Safety Engineer can earn is ₹7.5 Lakhs per year (₹62.5k per month).

What do you mean by safety engineer?

Safety engineering is the process of designing workplaces to prevent accidents. Engineering Safety Concepts provides detailed approaches and modes for accident reduction by using a risk management process to identify and “design out” hazards. Accidents can and do happen.

What is an example of product safety?

Safety Features The performance of products with respect to hazards. This includes avoidance of hazards such as an accident prevention system, safety equipment such as seat belts and resilience to hazards such as the crashworthiness of a vehicle.

Who is responsible for product safety?

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) protects the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from thousands of types of consumer products under its jurisdiction, including products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or can injure children.

How much do process safety engineers make in the Netherlands?

The estimated total pay for a Safety Engineer is €69,300 per year in the Netherlands area, with an average salary of €66,000 per year.

What is the highest paid Engineer?

Trends in the Highest Paying Engineering Jobs – There are some noteworthy trends when it comes to the highest paying engineering jobs. The engineering occupation that experienced the biggest growth in average annual pay is Chemical Engineers, which increased by 15.58%, from $105,420 in 2016 to $121,840 in 2021.

Nuclear Engineers come in second place here, seeing its average annual wage increase by 14.92% over the same period: From $105,950 to $121,760. And the engineering job with the third highest growth over the last five years is Computer Hardware Engineers, which increased by 14.77%: From $118,700 to $136,230.

Below you’ll find a table of all highest paying engineering jobs in the U.S. that the BLS has wage data for. Included in the table are the occupation titles, average hourly wages, average annual wages, and change over the last five years:

What is the main goal of a safety engineer?

Safety Engineering is an applied engineering science strongly related to industrial engineering and a subset Systems Engineering, Safety engineers usually work on the Risk Management Integrated Product Team (IPT) of an acquisition program. Safety engineering assures that a life-critical system behaves as needed even when components fail.

The goal of the safety engineering is to prevent/mitigate failures ( Risk Management ) in a system that might be harmful to its users. They start early in the design stage of a system to analyze where failures can occur then propose safety requirements in design specifications up front and changes to existing systems to make the system safer.

Safety engineers conduct design analysis to identify risk and safety hazards. The most common analysis techniques include:

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) Damage Mode and Effects Analysis (DMEA)

Safety engineering is a key player in any safety program. The purpose of a safety program is to ensure that hazards are identified and addressed throughout the life cycle of a program and system. Safety analyses must be initiated and performed during the earliest stages of any acquisition program.

Explain the impact of commercial items on the end item safety. For example, instruction manuals accompanying commercial equipment are found to contain inadequate warnings, cautions, and notes. This may require development of documentation to supplement the manuals.Identify all specifications and standards used in the safety program.Identify roles and responsibilities of participants in the safety planning and implementation efforts, and provide descriptions at the organization level.Identify safety risks for the end item. For each risk, provide a method for eliminating or mitigating the risk.Identify the Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) controls to be imposed on suppliers of ESD sensitive items.

AcqLinks and References:

Draft Naval Aviation Systems Team Acquisition Logistics Support Plan Guide – Chapter 14.3

What is an example of safety engineering?

Occupational Health and Safety – Occupational health and safety engineers help prevent harm to workers, property, the environment, and the general public. For example, they might design safe work spaces, inspect machines, or test air quality. In addition to making workers safer, safety engineers aim to increase worker productivity by reducing absenteeism and equipment downtime, and to save money by lowering insurance premiums and workers’ compensation payments, and preventing government fines.

What are some examples of safety engineering?

Directory of Engineering Controls Engineering controls protect workers by removing hazardous conditions or by placing a barrier between the worker and the hazard. Examples include local exhaust ventilation to capture and remove airborne emissions or machine guards to shield the worker.

• Well-designed engineering controls can be highly effective in protecting workers and will typically be independent of worker interactions.
• They typically do not interfere with worker productivity or personal comfort and make the work easier to perform rather than more difficult.
• The initial cost of engineering controls can be higher than some other control methods, but over the longer term, operating costs are frequently lower, and in some instances, can provide a cost savings in other areas of the process.

To learn more about how engineering controls fit into the strategy for reducing and/or eliminating occupational hazards, visit our website. NIOSH researchers help prevent occupational disease and injury by conducting engineering control technology evaluations and developing practical, solutions-oriented control technology interventions. NIOSH Researchers reduce the risk of fall injuries and fatalities in construction by evaluating mast climber fall-arrest scenarios and providing recommendations to standards committees and equipment manufacturers. : Directory of Engineering Controls

What does a safety and risk engineer do?

The Insurance Company Risk Engineer

• In order to understand the stimulating role of an insurance company’s risk engineer in improving firefighting measures, we must first get to know the role, responsibilities and tasks of the risk engineer within the insurance company.
• The insurance company is made up of sales offices and insurance agents, which are one of the main sources of business, and internal areas, such as underwriting areas (Underwriters); engineering areas (Risk Engineers); claims areas (Claims Managers), and other equally important areas such as finance, legal, operations, marketing, etc.
• Within this structure, risk engineers work supporting underwriters, who are responsible for setting insurance conditions according to the customer and type of business and are also in direct contact with claims managers to provide technical support if necessary.

1. Insurance Company Risk Engineer: Objective, Responsibilities and Tasks
2. One of the main objectives of an insurance company’s risk engineer is to support the underwriter in the underwriting process, making it easier for the underwriter to identify, analyze and assess the risks, the levels of risk control and the protection they have.
3. For this purpose, the risk engineers carry out risk inspection visits to the insured party’s facilities, in which they proceed to collect data, which will then serve to prepare a report that will include the analysis, evaluation and control of the risks.
4. This report prepared by risk engineers will support the underwriter in the underwriting process.

• On the other hand, the Risk Engineer advises on risk improvement/reduction measures to ensure adequate and acceptable levels of control for both the insured party and the insurance company.
• In addition, our engineers at MAPFRE Global Risks lead the Account Engineering Service by performing and coordinating other Engineering Services included in our Catalog, aimed at knowledge transfer, consulting for the reinforcement of security aspects and advising on matters of high specialization.
• Responsibilities of a Risk Engineer include:

• Risk analysis and assessment at insured companies considering the coverages of “property damage (fire, explosion, weather damage etc.), “machinery breakdown” and “loss of profit” associated with the material damage and/or machinery breakdown
• Drafting of improvement plans (recommendations)
• Technical services adapted for the insured party

The main tasks carried out by a risk engineer in the area of engineering at MAPFRE Global Risks include:

Field inspection visits or remote inspections,

These visits are usually carried out in person and, for this purpose, the engineer travels to the facilities of the insured party for data collection, which will then serve for the risk analysis and assessment process, However, in recent years, and mainly due to the pandemic, MAPFRE GLOBAL RISKS engineering has carried out a number of specific inspections virtually or in a hybrid manner, in which online meetings and video inspections have been held with the use of glasses or mobile phones and software adapted to this.

Preparation of inspection reports including risk analysis and assessment. With the information collected during the visit, we proceed to analyze a series of aspects (type of activity, risks associated with the activity, type of construction, process safety measures, prevention measures and protection measures), preparing an inspection report in which all the aspects analyzed and their evaluation are included, thus determining the level of risk control of the facilities visited.

Reporting improvement plans (recommendations). All aspects of improvement observed during the inspection visit are listed in the report called “Improvement Plan”. It develops the recommendations that are considered necessary to be carried out by the insured party to ensure acceptable levels of risk control.

Advice on the design, installation, commissioning of firefighting measures. In cases where the insured party is going to carry out the improvement of the level of fire protection in their facilities, with the installation of new protection systems (sprayers, deluge systems, etc.), MAPFRE GLOBAL RISKS engineering department provides advice, both in the design and at the time of the installation and receipt of the means of protection.

Technical advice and thermographies. Technical support to the insured party in technical aspects such as thermal images, business continuity plans, installation of solar panels in existing buildings, etc.

Training Internal and external training in risk analysis and evaluation, maintenance of fire protection means, thermal images, emergency plans, business continuity plans, etc.

Technical loss analysis (root cause analysis).

Risk Analysis and Assessment by Insurance Company Risk Engineer When analyzing and evaluating risks at insured companies, we must take into account the following main aspects:

• Activity (automotive, food, telecommunications, steel, paper, wood etc.)
• Type of risks by activity
• Process conditions
• Machinery type
• How hazards are controlled and protected in the plant
• Construction/compartmentalization
• Raw material, finished product
• Storage Type
• Maintenance and inspection
• Prevention measures
• Fire protection measures

When we talk about firefighting measures, we are referring to manual means (extinguishers, BIEs, hydrants, etc.); fire detection and alarm systems; automatic extinguishing means (sprayers, deluge systems, gas flood systems, etc.); fire water supply system and their maintenance and inspection. Comments found on firefighting during hazard inspections at insured companies

• Insufficient number of manual extinguishing equipment (extinguishers, BIEs, hydrants) or poor accessibility.
• No passive means of protection (walls and fire doors, cable gap clearance seals, etc.), as well as active protection (automatic fire detection and suppression) in high risk areas.
• Inadequate water supply system for extinguishing equipment.
• Poor maintenance and inspection of extinguishing equipment.

Recommendations after risk inspections at insured companies

• Review and expand the number of manual extinguishing equipment (extinguishers, BIEs, hydrants).
• Study and install means of passive protection, as well as active protection in high-risk areas.
• Ensure water supply system requirements and reliability for extinguishing media.
• Improve and reinforce maintenance of extinguishing media.

1. Technical support in implementing firefighting improvement plans
2. The MAPFRE Global Risks engineering department provides technical support to the insured party when implementing the improvement plans (recommendations).
3. Support from MAPFRE Global Risks Engineering includes advice on the design, installation, receipt of firefighting and training.
4. Advice on the design, installation, receipt of fire protection means includes the following:

• Analysis of the technical project, which provides, among others, the justification for the sizing of the necessary means of extinguishing. Starting point for adequate protection.
• Tracking the assembly and receiving phase of the fire protection installation.
• Verification that necessary information is provided to the user (insured party), including maintenance books.

As for training, it focuses on both passive and active protection, and includes knowledge on aspects such as maintenance, inspection and field testing of fire protection measures.

• Article author:
• María Teresa Queralt, Technical Department Expert at MAPFRE Global Risks.
• Keep reading

: The Insurance Company Risk Engineer

What are product safety requirements?

This page was updated 3 months ago Share Product safety regulations set product safety standards that suppliers of certain products must comply with. They are intended to help prevent and reduce the chance of accidents and injuries from using any of these products. Product safety standards may cover:

the nature of the product and its performance – for example, composition, contents, manufacture, design, construction, finish or packagingtests the products must go through during and/or after manufacturethe form and content of any markings, warnings or instructions on the product.

Supplying a product that fails to comply with the applicable product safety standard breaches the Fair Trading Act and is illegal. Product safety regulations currently in force set product safety standards by identifying all, or parts, of an official safety standard that must be complied with.

What are the issues with product safety?

What is Product Safety? – P roduct safety means the reduction in the possibility that use of a product will result in illness, injury, death or negative consequences to people, property or equipment. Most of the product safety issues can often be traced back to design flaws, fabrication or processing defects, software glitches, and packaging errors or a combination of these.

What is product safety training?

Consumer Product Safety Training At Intertek, we believe that essential safety knowledge can fundamentally transform your business. Intertek, the world’s leading expert on product safety, including international safety lawyers and product testing authorities, offers a product safety training that addresses key issues involved with integrating safety into your business process.

Product safety training is appropriate for anyone involved in the production of products consumed by the general public. The training content introduces key safety principles, and outlines the components necessary for companies and professionals to implement a process that will produce the safest product possible.

Need help or have a question? +44 1372 366 074 : Consumer Product Safety Training

What is product safety in as9100?

Aerospace Product Safety Considerations AS9100D para 8.1.3 requires organizations to plan, implement, and control the processes needed to assure product safety during the entire product life cycle. So what is Product Safety ? Product safety as defined by the AS9100D paragraph 3.4 is: The state in which a product is able to perform to its designed or intended purpose without causing unacceptable risk of harm to persons or damage to property.

The only way a product can perform to its designed intended purpose is to have been planned and cared for during every step of the manufacturing process. Planning, implementation and controlling processes to assure product safety is paramount. Awareness is also a key element in assuring product safety, as required by AS9100D para 7.3: The organization shall ensure that persons doing work under the organization’s control are aware of g) their contribution to product safety.

One of my favorite questions to ask someone on the manufacturing floor, supervisors and managers included, during an internal or external audit is: “What is product safety ? What is your contribution to product safety ?” Sometimes I get surprisingly great answers.

Such as: “I follow my procedures completely, I try to keep the product safe by following ESD protocols (ie. wrist/heel straps etc), covering the product to keep FOD (Foreign Object Debris) out, and handling the product very carefully.” I consider this to be a great answer by the way! Sometimes I get the deer in the headlights look with a “Can you repeat the question?” and then a stab in the dark answer, such as: “Well I try to work safely by wearing my safety glasses and other PPE.” While safety is absolutely important and is part of the concept of product safety, (” causing unacceptable risk of harm to persons”) it is not the whole story.

This type of answer prompts me to ask if there has been proper training about Product Safety, Many times organizations fail to train or fail to ensure that people are refreshed in this important concept of Product Safety, Another important AS9100D requirement related to product safety falls under paragraph 8.1 Operational Planning and Control.

G ood practices of personal and product safety should include robust manufacturing process instructions, inspection requirements, instructions for prevention, detection, and removal of foreign objects (FOD), handling, packaging, and preservation. Suppliers also play a significant role in assuring product safety.

AS9100D 8.4.3 Information for External Providers states: The organization shall communicate to external providers its requirements for: m. ensuring that persons are aware of: their contribution to product safety. It is essential that these requirements are flowed down to the supplier.

Who should bear the responsibility for product safety?

Who Should Pay? The Product Liability Debate Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez In 1977 Esther Kociemba began wearing the “Cu-7,” a copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) manufactured by G.D. Searle & Co. A year and a half later, hoping to become pregnant, she removed the device only to find she had become infertile.

• Doctors blamed her sterility on pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), a condition frequently associated with the use of IUDs.
• Ociemba hired a lawyer and brought a product liability suit against G.D.
• Searle, stating that the company should be held liable for her infertility.
• The company countered that PID was also associated with certain sexual activities, activities in which Kociemba might have engaged.

In addition, corporate representatives said that the risks of IUDs were well known to her doctor. Therefore, the company asserted, she and her doctor should be held responsible for her injuries. Every year, 34 million people are injured or killed as a result of product related accidents.

Such injuries are the major cause of death for people between the ages of 1 and 36, outnumbering deaths from cancer or heart disease. The estimated cost of these injuries is $12 billion annually. Tens of thousands of product injury lawsuits are filed each year. As the number of claims has risen, so too have the number of companies forced to file bankruptcy because of massive suits.

Moreover, an increasing number of companies are claiming that they have pulled established products off the market and halted research on promising products for fear of liability. Manufacturers claim that they are victims of a system gone haywire. According to strict liability laws, a manufacturer can be held liable for injuries even when he or she had no way of preventing those injuries.

Holding manufacturers responsible for injuries caused by products known to be defective or potentially dangerous is one thing, but today manufacturers face lawsuits-often bordering on the outrageous-for injuries they could not have prevented. Consumer activists, on the other hand, claim that the threat of product liability suits forces manufacturers to make product safety a priority and that those who suffer injuries caused by products should be compensated for their injuries by the manufacturers of those products.

Product injuries represent a major cost of introducing products into a society. Since virtually every new product carries some unknown risk, a possibility always exists that the product may cause injuries or impose other costs on users. This raises an important moral question: How should these costs be distributed among the members of our society? Should Consumers Bear More Responsibility? Manufacturers contend that consumers should bear more responsibility for product injuries because the costs of placing full liability onto companies far outweigh the benefits.

1. Since the 1960s, there has been a steady increase of product liability cases.
2. According to one study, 13,500 product liability suits were filed in federal court in 1986, compared to only 1,500 in 1974.
3. Due to this barrage of litigation, the cost of doing business has risen dramatically.
4. Insurance premiums have skyrocketed, where insurance is available at all.

Manufacturers’ legal costs have also soared: about 60% of the average corporation’s litigation expenses today are product liability cases. The rising cost of product liability insurance and lawsuits has led, in turn, to great increases in consumer prices.

The economy also has suffered from the boom in product liability claims. When companies facing massive lawsuits have been forced to scale down their operations, the result is a loss of jobs. In a recent report by the Conference Board, 15% of corporations surveyed had laid off workers because of product liability costs, while 8% had been forced to close plants altogether.

In addition, the threat of liability has affected American businesses’ ability to compete internationally. In other countries, there are severe limits on what manufacturers can be held responsible for and there is less tendency to sue. By not having to contend with a morass of lawsuits, these companies can offer cheaper products, and put American manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage.

• It is also argued that the fear of being hit with a liability claim keeps many lifesaving drugs and devices off the market, and stifles creativity and innovation.
• Even the most rigorous conformity to safety regulations doesn’t prevent liability.
• One report found that 39% of the companies surveyed delayed introducing new products or had discontinued products because of product liability suits.

The pharmaceutical industry has been hit the hardest. Only one company in the U.S. now manufactures vaccines, a product often targeted in lawsuits. Vaccines for AIDS will certainly not reach the market without protection against lawsuits. Said one spokesperson from the drug industry, “Decisions already being made on research priorities for liability reasons.” The costs to manufacturers and to society will only increase as technologies grow more complex and their applications more varied.

Testing products for safety under every possible condition of use will not only impose great testing costs on manufacturers but will result in enormous delays in the introduction of new products that could benefit society. Manufacturers also maintain that it is morally unjust to hold someone liable for injuries that he or she could not have prevented.

Through extensive research and repeated testing, companies do all that they possibly can to ensure product safety. And, to prevent harm, warnings and instructions are plastered over each piece of merchandise. Finally, some manufacturers point out that in a free market system, businesses have the right to make and sell whatever products they choose and consumers have the right to choose what they buy.

But rights carry with them responsibilities. When consumers choose to buy risky products rather than safe ones (both of which businesses may offer in a free market) or when they choose not to inform themselves about products, they must accept the consequences, including the responsibility for any injuries resulting from those choices.

Should Manufacturers Bear More Responsibility? Those who hold that manufacturers should bear more of the responsibility for product injuries argue that the benefits of holding companies liable for these injuries outweigh the costs. In a recent year, more than 200,000 infants were hospitalized for injuries resulting from the use of toys, or nursery or recreational equipment.

About 1,777,000 people required emergency treatment because of injuries involving home furnishings; more than 1,200 of these injuries were fatal. An additional 1,782,000 individuals required treatment for injuries involving home construction materials; 1,300 of them died from the injuries. Society has an obligation to minimize such tragedy and suffering.

Without the threat of liability, manufacturers would have little incentive to ensure product safety, and the number of product-related injuries would escalate. The costs of holding manufacturers responsible for product injuries are not as great as company representatives would have us believe.

1. For example, the so-called “explosion” in product liability suits, “crippling American business,” is a myth.
2. A recent study by the RAND Corporation found that although the number of product liability lawsuits had increased nearly eight-fold during the last decade, more that half of these lawsuits involved only a handful of companies, reflecting mass litigation against a few asbestos and pharmaceutical companies.

A report by the Government Accounting Office also concluded that, except for cases involving a few drug or asbestos companies, product liability suits “do not appear to have been rapidly accelerating or explosive.” Furthermore, it cannot be claimed that product litigation makes domestic companies any less competitive internationally.

1. Foreign companies that sell in the U.S.
2. Have to abide by the same product liability laws that American companies face.
3. And when American companies compete abroad, they have the same advantages that foreign companies have.
4. Those who hold manufacturers liable for product-related injuries also claim that justice is on their side.

Since the defective product that caused the injury was produced by the manufacturer, it is fair that the manufacturer bear the costs of that injury. Moreover, they argue, justice requires that the party that is most able to pay for an injury be the party that bears most of the financial burden.

1. Manufacturers know in advance that there is always a risk of liability in introducing new products, and can therefore build the cost of potential lawsuits into the price of those products.
2. Manufacturers also have the research expertise and laboratories, the engineering and technical knowledge, and the budgets to assess the risks of product use and to ensure that these products are safe.

Consumers lack these. It is just to place greater burdens on those who are better able to bear these burdens. Consumer activists also challenge the corporate claim that consumers “freely” choose to buy unsafe products. Consumers, they argue, are woefully uninformed about the products they buy because they don’t have access to information about the products.

• Others lack a comprehensive understanding of the seriousness of the printed warning.
• Still others may be functionally illiterate or too young to make informed choices.
• It is manufacturers, not consumers, who make the “free” choices to compromise product safety and it is manufacturers who must therefore accept the consequences.

As long as products are produced, product injuries will occur. Who should bear the costs of those injuries? Our answer requires that we weigh the claims of consumers against those of manufacturers-claims which appeal, in different ways, to our desire to minimize harm, our ideal of justice, and our commitment to taking responsibility for the choices we make.

1. Further reading Andrew Eiler, The Consumer Protection Manual (New York: Facts on File, 1983).
2. Peter Huber, “Are We Afraid of the Future?” Reader’s Digest, Vol.133 (December 1988), pp.191-2, 194.
3. Peter Huber, “Litigation Thwarts Innovation in the U.S.,” Scientific American, Vol.260 (March 1989), p.120.

Deborah Johnson, Computer Ethics (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1985), pp.39-55. Catolyn Lockhead, “Liability’s Creative Clamp Holds Finns to the Status Quo,” Insight (August 29, 1988), pp.38-40. “Unsafe Products: The Great Debate Over Blame and Punishment,” Business Week (April 30,1984), pp.96-104.

What is the role of a product safety manager?

Electrical Safety Authority Mississauga, Ontario Last Day to Apply: July 12, 2022 ESA is seeking an experienced and effective engineer and manager for the role of Product Safety Manager to lead our Product Safety team and help make Ontario safer. About the Job The Product Safety Manager is a key contributor on the engineering leadership team and plays a crucial role in the continued development and execution of the product safety mandate.

Competitive Salary Comprehensive Benefit and Pension Plan Employee Assistance Program Wellness Program Employee Recognition Program

About Us The ESA is one of Ontario’s leading employers. If you choose to join our team, you will be entering a safety and development focused environment where we will care about YOU as a member of our team and as an individual. We take care of members of our team with an industry-leading benefits package and a defined-benefit pension plan, not to mention our competitive salaries.

Apply knowledge of electrical and forensic engineering, and sound investigative techniques, including cause and effect analysis in incident reviews. Lead, collect, analyze, and report on incident/fire reviews. Responsible for collecting, analyzing, interpreting, summarizing and presenting qualitative data for the purpose of planning and policy development or other goals of the organization. Develop ESA strategies on health and safety requirements. Identify needs related to future development of public electrical safety initiatives and services.

Responsible for leading, assessing and preparing technical materials related to electrical codes, utility regulation, and products regulation such as bulletins, proposals and other technical documents and articles. Responsible for development of Inspector training material. Review all changes and consult with internal and external stakeholders. Assist ESA Inspection personnel on the interpretation and application of electrical codes, utility regulation, and products regulation to achieve greater consistency of interpretation, and proper inspection performance and procedures with respect to wiring and electrical installations, and approval of electrical equipment. Through active listening and questioning, ensure there is a thorough understanding of client needs. Liaise with other department staff, and internal and external contacts as needed to provide the information and advice needed in a timely manner. Conduct technical analysis of problems and produce memoranda and bulletins in consultation with supervisor to resolve field problems. Receive requests from supervisor to examine particular aspects of electrical installations or electrical equipment. Consult with other advisors, managers, certification organizations, equipment manufacturers, consultants, utility staff and other external organizations. Consult the Electrical Safety Code, Utility Regulation, other codes and regulations, equipment standards, safety records and technical literature. Prepare memoranda, bulletins and other documents for use by field staff based on supervisor direction, using existing departmental documentation, guidelines, bulletins and published interpretations. Work with staff and industry stakeholders to increase ESA’s involvement in the review and analysis of electrical incidents. Develop, lead, and improve ESA’s processes and capability related to the review of incidents. Use incident review techniques and root cause analysis techniques to identify the underlying cause of electrical incidents and fires. Provide advice, guidance, direction and support to ESA on issues related to public electrical safety matters. Review incidents, sign off and update database. Utilize risk management principles, processes and techniques to identify and assess public electrical safety hazards. Provide advice and guidance to ESA in determining the types of public electrical safety programs and initiatives it needs to put in place to achieve the greatest possible impact on electrical safety. Collaborate with staff to share incidents at technical meetings to inform & discuss possible next steps. Assess the safety impact of its programs and services. Participate on Standards subcommittees responsible for the Canadian Electrical Code, the Electrical Safety Code and other electrical codes and safety standards. At the committee, support ESA Regulatory initiatives and communicate ESA’s Regulatory outlook. As department representative, present advice on code and standard changes as needed. Maintain awareness of the latest principles and processes and techniques in health and safety field and use this information to improve or deliver on its safety strategy. Plan, monitor, and coordinate research and planning activities. Develop ESA strategies on health and safety requirements and provide expertise in the interpretation and administration of Health and Safety Policies and Procedures in Municipal, Provincial and Federal legislation and in health and safety management. Represent ESA to selected organizations, I.e. IAPA, Construction Safety Association, OFMEM, Ministry of Labour, in the discussion and exchange of health and safety information.

Requirements: Education:

Experience:

Additional Information:

Please apply on our website at https://esasafe.com/careers/

What is product safety in as9100?

Aerospace Product Safety Considerations AS9100D para 8.1.3 requires organizations to plan, implement, and control the processes needed to assure product safety during the entire product life cycle. So what is Product Safety ? Product safety as defined by the AS9100D paragraph 3.4 is: The state in which a product is able to perform to its designed or intended purpose without causing unacceptable risk of harm to persons or damage to property.

• The only way a product can perform to its designed intended purpose is to have been planned and cared for during every step of the manufacturing process.
• Planning, implementation and controlling processes to assure product safety is paramount.
• Awareness is also a key element in assuring product safety, as required by AS9100D para 7.3: The organization shall ensure that persons doing work under the organization’s control are aware of g) their contribution to product safety.

One of my favorite questions to ask someone on the manufacturing floor, supervisors and managers included, during an internal or external audit is: “What is product safety ? What is your contribution to product safety ?” Sometimes I get surprisingly great answers.

Such as: “I follow my procedures completely, I try to keep the product safe by following ESD protocols (ie. wrist/heel straps etc), covering the product to keep FOD (Foreign Object Debris) out, and handling the product very carefully.” I consider this to be a great answer by the way! Sometimes I get the deer in the headlights look with a “Can you repeat the question?” and then a stab in the dark answer, such as: “Well I try to work safely by wearing my safety glasses and other PPE.” While safety is absolutely important and is part of the concept of product safety, (” causing unacceptable risk of harm to persons”) it is not the whole story.

This type of answer prompts me to ask if there has been proper training about Product Safety, Many times organizations fail to train or fail to ensure that people are refreshed in this important concept of Product Safety, Another important AS9100D requirement related to product safety falls under paragraph 8.1 Operational Planning and Control.

G ood practices of personal and product safety should include robust manufacturing process instructions, inspection requirements, instructions for prevention, detection, and removal of foreign objects (FOD), handling, packaging, and preservation. Suppliers also play a significant role in assuring product safety.

AS9100D 8.4.3 Information for External Providers states: The organization shall communicate to external providers its requirements for: m. ensuring that persons are aware of: their contribution to product safety. It is essential that these requirements are flowed down to the supplier.

What is product safety process?

The purpose of this procedure is to define processes for the management of product safety-related products and manufacturing processes in order to ensure the product performs according to its designated purpose without causing harm or damages.

What are the four main purposes of the product safety Act?

2. to assist consumers in evaluating the comparative safety of consumer products.3.to develop uniform safety standards for consumer products and to minimize conflicting state and local regulations.4.to promote research and investigation into the causes and prevention of product related deaths, illness and injuries.

Jack Gloop