The Purpose Of The Community Safety Education Act – The first purpose of the Community Safety Education Act is to provide education and resources that can prevent accidents and promote safety in communities. This is accomplished by requiring certain institutions, such as schools and youth organizations, to provide safety education to their constituents.

The goal is to ensure that individuals are equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to prevent accidents and respond effectively in emergency situations. This education can include topics such as fire safety, first aid, and emergency preparedness. By providing individuals with the tools and knowledge they need to stay safe, the Community Safety Education Act helps to prevent accidents and promote public safety.

The second purpose of the Community Safety Education Act is to require certain institutions to provide safety education to their constituents. This includes schools and youth organizations, which are required to offer safety education programs to their students and members.

1. These programs are designed to educate individuals about potential hazards and risks, and to provide them with the skills and knowledge they need to stay safe.
2. By requiring these institutions to provide safety education, the Community Safety Education Act helps to ensure that individuals are prepared to respond to emergencies and prevent accidents.

The third purpose of the Community Safety Education Act is to establish funding for community safety programs and initiatives. This funding can be used to support a wide range of initiatives, from public awareness campaigns to community safety programs.

What is the purpose of the community safety?

Community safety is about helping communities to be and feel safe. It is important that you feel safe where you live, work or spend your leisure time. There are ways that you can get involved to help improve the safety of your own community.

What is SB 30 in Texas?

What is Senate Bill (SB) 30, Community Safety Education Act? SB 30, also known as The Community Safety Education Act, was passed by the 85th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2017. The legislation added Section 28.012, regarding the instruction on interaction with law enforcement, to the Texas Education Code (TEC).

What is the 3 purpose of community action?

Building community and social capacity – helping the community to share knowledge, skills and ideas. Community resilience – helping the community to support itself. Prevention – a focus on early access to services or support, engagement in design, cross-sector collaboration and partnerships.

What is the safe community concept?

Safe Communities America, Inc. is the new, non-profit coordinating and accrediting organization for Safe Communities in the United States. In affiliation with the Pan-Pacific Safe Communities Network, we extend national and international accreditation to communities that meet the Safe Communities standards.

• The National Safety Council formerly served as the US accrediting organization for Safe Communities, but SCA became an independent, non-profit organization in 2018.
• SCA is governed by a board of directors composed of representatives from accredited Safe Communities in the US, as well as from the Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center (KIPRC).

KIPRC was accredited as an International Safe Communities Support Center in 2013 and reaccredited in 2018 by the Pan Pacific Safe Communities Network (PPSCN). KIPRC also currently serves as the national Safe Community Accrediting Center in the United States.

1. This website is currently under construction but more content will be added soon.
2. In the meantime, please be aware that SCA is accepting applications from communities seeking Safe Community accreditation and we are moving forward with the review process for those communities currently in the application process.

What is a Safe Community? A Safe Community is a community where people can live, work and play without fear or risk of injury. It is a place that is safe and attractive to live and to visit. It is a place where community leaders and organizations have come together to plan and create programs that reduce injury and violence and improve community health and well-being.

1. Most injuries and “accidents” are both predictable and preventable.
2. We know that doing certain things increases our risk for being injured, while doing other things reduces our risk of injury.
3. A Safe Community is a community that has made a commitment to doing things that reduce injury risk while avoiding choices that increase the risk of injury.

The Safe Communities program is an international initiative supported by the World Health Organization (WHO), It is a program that establishes standards and guidelines for communities that want to develop effective, sustainable injury prevention programs.

Communities that meet the standards can be accredited nationally and internationally as a Safe Community. Accreditation recognizes and affirms that the community has the necessary commitment and infrastructure in place to plan, implement and evaluate effective programs to reduce injuries and violence.

Safe Communities in the United States are accredited nationally by Safe Communities America, through KIPRC, and internationally by the PPSCN.

What is SB 3 law in Texas?

Texas Senate Bill 3 (Adjourned Sine Die) Relating to providing property tax relief through the public school finance system, exemptions, limitations on appraisals and taxes, and property tax administration.

What is SB 179 Texas law?

BILL ANALYSIS

AUTHOR’S / SPONSOR’S STATEMENT OF INTENT The school environment has become increasingly complex, with more academic oportunities and challenges than ever before. Crises in recent years, from school shootings to natural disasters to this past year’s pandemic, have only worsened these pressures.

Unfortunately, when the guidance and support of school counselors is needed more than ever, counselors find a significant portion of their day consumed by coordinating and overseeing standardized testing, along with other non-counseling duties. Without the attention and support of their counselors, the academic performance and mental health of Texas students will suffer.S.B.179 restores the balance of academic guidance, emotional support, and other administrative tasks in the counselor’s workload by requiring that school counselors spend at least 80 percent of their time performing statutorily-defined counseling duties.

This will ensure that school counselors have ample time to devote to the academic and emotional needs of the students under their care. With S.B.179, school counselors will be able to devote the necessary time to steering Texas students toward bright futures.

As proposed, S.B.179 amends current law relating to the use of public school counselors’ work time. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the commissioner of education in SECTION 3 (Section 39.056, Education Code) of this bill. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 33.006, Education Code, by adding Subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), as follows: (d) Requires the board of trustees of each school district, except as provided by Subsection (e), to adopt a policy that requires a school counselor to spend at least 80 percent of the school counselor’s total work time on duties that are components of a counseling program developed under Section 33.005 (Comprehensive School Counseling Programs).

Provides that, for purposes of this subsection, time spent in administering assessment instruments or providing other assistance in connection with assessment instruments, except time spent in interpreting data from assessment instruments, is not considered time spent on counseling.

Requires each school in the district to implement the policy. Requires that a copy of the policy be maintained in the office of each school in the district and made available on request during regular school hours to district employees, parents of district students, and the public. (e) Requires that, if the board of trustees of a school district determines that, because of staffing needs in the district or at a school in the district, a school counselor must spend less than 80 percent of the school counselor’s total work time on duties that are components of a counseling program developed under Section 33.005, the policy adopted under Subsection (d): (1) include the reasons why the counselor needs to spend less than 80 percent of the counselor’s work time on duties that are components of the counseling program; (2) list the duties the counselor is expected to perform that are not components of the counseling program; and (3) set the percentage of work time that the counselor is required to spend on components of the counseling program.

(f) Prohibits a school district from including a provision in an employment contract with a school counselor under Chapter 21 (Educators) that conflicts with the policy required by Subsection (d) or, except as provided by Subsection (g), has the effect of authorizing a school principal or school district superintendent to require a school counselor to generally perform duties that are not primarily related to a counseling function.

(g) Prohibits a school district to which Subsection (e) applies from including a provision in an employment contract under Chapter 21 with an affected school counselor that has the effect of requiring the counselor to generally perform a duty that is not primarily related to a counseling function unless the duty is specified in the district’s policy under Subsection (e)(2).

SECTION 2. Amends Section 7.028(a), Education Code, by adding Section 39.056(d-1) to a list of exceptions to the Texas Education Agency’s (TEA) authority to monitor compliance with requirements applicable to certain processes or programs. SECTION 3. Amends Section 39.056, Education Code, by adding Subsection (d-1), as follows: (d-1) Requires the commissioner of education (commissioner), before an accreditation monitoring review, to request that the school district scheduled for the review assess the district’s compliance with the policy adopted under Section 33.006(d) and provide a written copy of the assessment to TEA on or before the date specified by the commissioner.

Requires TEA, as a part of each monitoring review, to interview a percentage of district school counselors determined by the commissioner to assess the district’s compliance with the policy adopted under Section 33.006(d). Requires the commissioner to adopt rules to implement this subsection. SECTION 4.

(a) Requires each school district to implement a policy adopted under Section 33.006(d), Education Code, as added by this Act, beginning with the 2021-2022 school year. (b) Makes the application of Sections 33.006(f) and (g) prospective. (c) Provides that Section 7.028(a), Education Code, as amended by this Act, and Section 39.056(d-1), Education Code, as amended by this Act, apply beginning with the 2021-2022 school year.

What is Texas law SB 6?

SB 6 requires OCA to create a system by April 1, 2022, that will create reports for magistrates to consider when making bail decisions on defendants. These reports are called public safety reports (PSR) and the overall system is the public safety report system (PSRS), Public Safety Report System (PSRS) The two main goals of the system are:

1. Provide a summary of criminal history information to magistrates for the purpose of more effectively setting bail and bond conditions.These summaries are Public Safety Reports (PSR).
2. Provide a mechanism of reporting bail decisions to OCA.

The system is not designed to be a “one stop shop” for all magistrate duties or to keep records of all magistration information. Public Safety Reports (PSR) A public safety report (PSR) must be considered any time a defendant is arrested for any jailable offense and their release on bail is being considered.

The PSR must : (1) state the requirements for setting bail under Article 17.15 and list each factor provided by Article 17.15(a) ( see pages 18-19 of the Magistration Deskbook for these factors ); (2) provide the defendant’s name and date of birth or, if impracticable, other identifying information, the cause number of the case, if available, and the offense for which the defendant was arrested; (3) provide information on the eligibility of the defendant for a personal bond ( see pages 22-25 of the Magistration Deskbook for more info on eligibility for personal bond ); (4) provide information regarding the applicability of any required or discretionary bond conditions ( see pages 28-30 of the Magistration Deskbook and the Magistration Bench Cards for more info on bond conditions ); (5) provide, in summary form, the criminal history of the defendant, including information regarding any: (A) previous misdemeanor or felony convictions; (B) pending charges; (C) previous sentences imposing a term of confinement; (D) previous convictions or pending charges for: (i) offenses that are offenses involving violence as defined by Article 17.03; or (ii) offenses involving violence directed against a peace officer; and (E) previous failures of the defendant to appear in court following release on bail; and (6) be designed to collect and maintain the information provided on a bail form submitted under Section 72.038, Government Code.

Bail Forms Additionally, Gov’t Code Sec.72.038 mandates that a bail form containing certain information must be submitted to OCA through the PSRS every time that bail is set under Chapter 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This form is not the order setting bond or conditions, but simply a report to OCA of what occurred in the magistration.

The form must: • State the cause number, if available, the defendant’s name and date of birth, and the offense for which the defendant was arrested; • State the name and office or position of the person setting bail; • Require the person setting bail to identify the bail type, the amount of the bail, and any conditions of bail; certify that the person considered each factor provided by Art.17.15(a); certify that the person considered the information provided by the public safety report system; and • Be electronically signed by the person setting bail.

Important Note : the below education requirements do apply to all justices of the peace, regardless of whether they perform magistration or set bail. For information on how to satisfy these requirements, visit our Magistration Education Page, For all Justices of the Peace serving on April 1, 2022: All justices of the peace must be in compliance with educational requirements related to magistrate duties.

• These include an eight-hour course on magistrate duties by December 1, 2022 for magistrates in office on April 1, 2022, including a DPS course on accessing criminal history records (see the FAQ below for more details).
• Additionally, two hours of education on magistrate’s duties must be completed each subsequent state fiscal biennium (the two-year period beginning on September 1 in odd-numbered years, such as September 1, 2023-August 31, 2025).

Code of Criminal Procedure Arts.17.023, 17.024. For all new Justices of the Peace: All justices of the peace must be in compliance with educational requirements related to magistrate duties. These include an eight-hour course on magistrate duties within 90 days of taking office, including a DPS course on accessing criminal history records (see the FAQ below for more details).

All judges taking office after April 1, 2022 must receive this education within 90 days of taking office. For newly-elected judges, TJCTC’s New Judge seminars already contain education that meets this requirement. For newly-appointed judges taking office more than 90 days before TJCTC’s New Judge seminar, we strongly recommend you follow option 1 under Virtual Options in the FAQ “How Can I Satisfy My Educational Requirements?” below.

Additionally, a two-hour course on magistrate’s duties must be completed each subsequent state fiscal biennium (the two-year period beginning on September 1 in odd-numbered years, such as September 1, 2023-August 31, 2025). Code of Criminal Procedure Arts.17.023, 17.024.

• View OCA’s checklist. Step 1 – Ensure your court has an ORI number Not sure what an ORI number is or if your court has one? In order to access the system, magistrates must have an Originating Agency Identification (ORI) number which is provided by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). The ORI number is a federal designation that provides agencies access to the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (NLETS), and, in Texas, the Texas Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (TLETS). OCA has created an online resource, Originating Agency Numbers (ORI) and TLETS Access, with information regarding SB6 and resources on how to obtain an ORI number from DPS should your court require one. Included on the site is a list of courts with an existing ORI number, as provided by DPS.​ If you believe your court needs an ORI number, please review the list above to make sure that your court or jurisdiction doesn’t already have one, and reach out to the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) following the instructions below: Courts should submit the following on agency letterhead: Court Name Name of contact person Physical address including the county Court main phone number Type of cases heard by this Court (Please specify whether cases are Criminal or Civil) Email The preferred method of submission is email: [email protected] If the above option is not available, paperwork may be mailed to: Texas Department of Public Safety Michelle Farris, Chief Crime Records Division MSC: 0233 PO Box 4143 Austin, TX 78765-4143 Step 2 – Designate a Local Administrative User The Local Administrative User (LAU) will be responsible for entering other system end users into the PSRS. The LAU will need to complete an electronic PSRS User Registration Form so their user account can be set up ahead of time. Once the LAU’s account is set up in the system, a notification will be sent with guidance on how to enter end users from their jurisdiction in the system. The LAU may be different from court to court. Some courts will have the judge be the LAU, whereas others will have the court coordinator or other court personnel fill that role. Some counties may have courts share a LAU, if desired. Step 3 – The LAU Designates All Users of the PSRS This includes anyone who will be entering information into the PSRS, such as court personnel doing data entry, not just magistrates. End users will then need to complete a two-factor authentication process to verify their identity. Download instructions here, Note that Automon added the ability to use an email address instead of a text message on April 1, sinced some users cannot have their phones in jails where they need to use the PSRS. Download those instructions here, Step 4 – Designate a Terminal Agency Coordinator (TAC) or Administrator Both the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) require that all agencies with a terminal with access to TLETS appoint a Terminal Agency Coordinator for each ORI number. If your jurisdiction/ORI does not have a terminal with TLETS access you can appoint an Administrator instead. OCA recommends that the individual identified to be the PSRS Local Administrative User also be the current TAC or Administrator required by DPS. The TAC or Administrator is responsible for ensuring that all users designated under an ORI are complying with guidelines related to access to criminal history information and are compliant with all training requirements. Non-Terminal Agency Agreement and TLETS Access Guidelines All courts accessing criminal history information in TLETS through the PSRS that is not done through a dedicated terminal will need to complete a Non-Terminal Agency Agreement with OCA. The agreement is by ORI number and not by individual users. The agreement must be signed by the DPS required TAC or Administrator. Please note this is not the same as the PSRS Local Administrative User, though it is recommended that it be the same person. Courts/jurisdictions with TLETS access will also be required to have a set of guidelines that they abide by on the use of TLETS access. Step 5 – Get a TLETS ID, if Required In order to pull criminal history information from TLETS a user must have been assigned a TLETS User ID by DPS. A TLETS User ID is assigned to an individual through their jurisdiction’s ORI number. In order to generate a PSR, the PSRS will pull information from TLETS, therefore, if a user requires access to create PSRs through the PSRS, a TLETS User ID must be requested from DPS. To request a TLETS User ID from DPS, a New User Request Form must be submitted by the jurisdiction’s Terminal Agency Coordinator (TAC) or the Administrator assigned under the ORI number. This will only be required for magistrates or other individuals who generate PSRs, not for those who simply review PSRs. For more information on how to request a TLETS ID contact DPS via email at: [email protected] Step 6 – Take any Required DPS Training See the other section on the DPS training in this FAQ to determine which, if any, course you will need to take. Step 7 – Take any Required Judicial Education See the other section on judicial education requirements for information on what the requirements are and how to fulfill them.
• Art.17.022(f) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that if the PSRS is down for more than 12 hours, a defendant charged with only misdemeanor offenses may be magistrated without considering a PSR. Best practice would be to consider criminal history from an alternate source if possible. The statute is silent as to what happens if the defendant is charged with a felony. TJCTC recommends performing the magistration and making the bail decision within the statutorily-mandated 48 hour time period, and considering criminal history from an alternate source if possible, and considering a PSR when available, and scheduling a bond modification, if necessary.
• If you are having a problem with the two-factor authentication, download instructions here, TJCTC is unable to provide assistance related to your login, ORI, LAU, or other details of the PSRS. For assistance on these issues, including over-the-weekend help through April 15, you can reach OCA’s bail team by emailing [email protected], You can reach the Automon help desk by calling 480-368-8555 and selecting option 2, or by email at [email protected],
• Effective April 1, it is mandatory in most situations, including after an on-sight arrest or on an arrest warrant based on probable cause for a new offense, for a magistrate to review a PSR before setting bail. If you have not yet gotten signed up, in order to magistrate, the best option is to have someone who has access print off a PSR for you to review. Please see the other sections of this page for more info on signing up, and contact OCA or Automon for assistance in signing up, as TJCTC is unable to assist in that process. Keep in mind that you will need to complete the self-paced CJP certification if you review criminal history, including PSRs. You will need to complete the 8-hour TLETS mobile certification if you are going to query the system to create PSRs. You do have a six-month grace period to get these certifications, so you do not have to wait until they are completed before accessing the system.
• If you do not perform magistrations or set bail under Chapter 17, you will not need to register to use the PSRS. However, the 8-hour initial education requirement, and the 2-hour requirement each subsequent state fiscal biennium do apply to all justices of the peace, regardless of whether they perform magistration or set bail. The DPS training classes to access criminal history would not be required for any justice of the peace who does not view PSRs or otherwise review criminal history documents.
• Don’t worry! The system is being finalized currently, but detailed PDFs and screencasts will be provided shortly. Additionally, anyone may view recordings of the training sessions on this OCA resource page, There are separate trainings for LAUs (people who add users to the system) and end users (such as magistrates reviewing PSRs and submitting bail forms.) TJCTC is unable to provide assistance related to your login, ORI, LAU, or other details of the PSRS. For assistance on these issues, including over-the-weekend help through April 15, you can reach OCA’s bail team by emailing [email protected], You can reach the Automon help desk by calling 480-368-8555 and selecting option 2, or by email at [email protected],
• Note that users have a six-month grace period to receive these certifications after registering to use the PSRS. There are two different levels of certification that users will require, depending on how they will interact with the PSRS, the 8-hour TLETS Mobile Access Certification and the self-paced (roughly 90-120 minute) Criminal Justice Practitioner certification. Additionally, anyone who will be accessing criminal history information or present while it is handled or discussed must take the CJIS Security Training Course. Criminal Justice Practitioner Certification (Self-Paced, 1.5-2 hours) Individuals who only access hard or electronic copies of PSRs, and do not query or search TLETS themselves directly through a terminal or the PSRS, will only have to obtain and maintain a Criminal Justice Practitioner (CJP) certification. This would apply, for example, for magistrates who have sheriff department or other jail personnel query the system and generate PSRs for the magistrate to view. TLETS Mobil Access Certification is not required for these types of users but can still be obtained if desired. The CJP certification can be obtained after a one-two hour self-paced online course. Recertification is required after two years. If at some point the user begins to access TLETS directly through the PSRS, the TLETS Mobil Access Certification must be completed. A User Request Form must be completed by the jurisdiction’s TAC or Administrator to request access to either certification training. This form is password protected as personal information is needed to create an account. For access to the User Request Form, questions about the TLETS access trainings and certifications, or to verify if certifications are still valid, contact DPS via email at: [email protected] TLETS Mobile Access Certification (8 hours) All users who will be directly querying TLETS through the PSRS to pull criminal history information on a defendant must have a current TLETS Mobile Access Certification. This certification is granted after the completion of an 8-hour live training. The training is provided by DPS, both virtually and in-person, on specific days and times. New users have a 6-month grace period to complete the 8-hour training from the date they received TLETS access. Recertification is required after two years. CJIS Security Awareness Training (self-paced, approx.1 hour) Any PSRS users with access to Criminal Justice Information (CJI) through TLETS must take the CJIS Security Awareness Training. Training shall be taken within six months and biennially thereafter. The training through CJIS Online is web based and self-paced. CJIS Security Policy 5.9 – Section 5.2 Security Awareness is federally mandated, The training is designed to equip those who are authorized to access CJI with basic tools to protect the data. For information on how to access the CJIS Security Awareness Training please have the Administrator or TAC email DPS at [email protected] or [email protected], For more information on CJIS Security Training please visit the DPS CJIS page,
• Automon is currently updating the system to add functionality to modify bail forms. A document has been created outlining the steps to follow until the system is further updated. Download the document.
• The Local Administrative User (LAU) is a person designated by an agency or entity (such as a jail, court, sheriff’s department, etc.) to be responsible for signing that entity’s users up to be system end users of the PSRS. Anyone who needs to be logged in to the PSRS to enter information or view PSRs must either be an LAU or be added by an LAU. The Terminal Agency Coordinator (TAC) or Administrator is the person designated by an entity having an ORI to ensure that criminal history is viewed in compliance with applicable restrictions and that anyone using that ORI has the required training to view criminal history, or to query TLETS to pull up criminal history records. The LAU and TAC/Admin can be, but do not have to be, the same person for a given entity, and each locality should decide what makes the most sense for their given needs.
• Unfortunately at this time, the PSRS does not have functionality to integrate with other case management software systems, though perhaps it will be added with future updates.
• Unfortunately at this time, the PSRS does not have functionality to fill out and generate magistrate certifications and order forms, though perhaps it will be added with future updates.
• When a person’s bond is modified, a PSR is not required to be considered (though the magistrate or court modifying the bond must consider all of the factors in Art.17.15(a), including the defendant’s criminal history information, so the magistrate may wish to do so by viewing a PSR). However, a bail form must be submitted through the PSRS when the modification occurs, if either the bond type or amount is modified. If only the bond conditions are changed, a new bail form is not required, though there are separate bond condition reporting requirements (discussed elsewhere in this FAQ). This requirement would apply to new bonds applied after a modification hearing or after a surety surrender or other bond modification process.
• For issuance of standard arrest warrants (meaning a warrant issued after presentation of a probable cause affidavit for arrest on a new charge), use of the PSRS will not be required. Bond amounts on arrest warrants are recommendations, and therefore not final determinations of bail, so a PSR does not need to be considered, and a bail form does not have to be generated. When the person is arrested, the magistrate who determines the bail amount must review a PSR and submit a bail form. Warrants where the issuing court is determining the bail amount, and a magistrate may not modify that amount, such as warrants on probation revocation hearings, would require a bail form to be generated, but not consideration of a PSR. This bail form should be generated once the defendant is arrested and ordered to post the bail. Since there is no bail on a capias pro fine warrant, there is no bail form generated and a PSR does not need to be considered.
• No. No PSR is needed to be considered because the magistrate isn’t “considering the release on bail of a defendant charged with an offense punishable as a Class B misdemeanor or any higher category of offense.” because the person isn’t charged with a Texas offense. Additionally, a bail form is not needed to be submitted because bail isn’t being set under Chapter 17 of the CCP but instead under Chapter 51.

What are the 4 core values of community action?

Integrity: We believe that the example we set means everything. Respect: We consciously embrace diversity and strive to eliminate injustice. Performance: We innovate, measure our success, and move forward with purpose. Community: We are better when we work together.

What are the 5 factors of community action?

Learn More – For more information on how to understand and measure a sense of community, click here, By David Chavis | 2022-02-21T16:31:47-05:00 February 18, 2022 | Equitable Community Development | Comments Off on Strategic Factors for Strengthening Our Communities: The Five C’s Community, Connections, Control, Cash, & Collective Action Page load link

What are the 5 importance of community development?

Community development is a holistic approach and an organized effort initiated to assist a group of people in a community to lead a better lifestyle. As the term suggests, it is the combination of community with a development that aims to enhance people’s living standards in a community.

In this, people must have faith that working together can make a difference in making the community development programme successful. Community development involves the principles of sustainable development, empowerment, inclusivity, social justice, human rights, participative democracy, and equality.

These community-led programmes led by specific communities aim to address the challenges and gaps oppressing the community members. From the selection of issues to implementation and execution, the community members sit together and decide what steps are to be taken.

What are two characteristics of a safe community?

Characteristics of a safe and resilient community A safe and resilient community. is knowledgeable and healthy. It has the ability to assess, manage and monitor its risks. It can learn new skills and build on past experience. is organised. It has the capacity to identify problems, establish priorities and act. www.ifrc.org Saving lives, changing minds. –

What are two purposes of a community of practice safe?

It’s said that a wise person learns from his mistakes. A wiser one learns from others’ mistakes. But the wisest person of all learns from others’ successes. —John C. Maxwell, Leadership Gold Communities of Practice (CoPs) are organized groups of people with a common interest in a specific technical or business domain.

1. They regularly collaborate to share information, improve their skills, and actively work on advancing their knowledge of the domain.
2. Definition courtesy of Etienne Wenger from his book Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, ) Healthy CoPs have a culture built on professional networking, personal relationships, shared knowledge, and common skills.

Combined with voluntary participation, CoPs provide knowledge workers with opportunities to experience autonomy, mastery, and purpose beyond their daily tasks on an Agile Release Train (ART), CoPs enable SAFe participants to exchange knowledge and skills with people across the entire organization.

1. This open membership offers access to a wide range of expertise to help with technical challenges and fuel continuous improvement.
2. It allows more meaningful contributions to the larger goals of the Enterprise,
3. The result is that organizations benefit from rapid problem-solving, improved quality, cooperation across multiple domains, and increased retention of top talent.

According to Wenger, CoPs must have three distinct traits to be considered a community of practice, as shown in Figure 1.

Domain – An area of shared interest Practice – A shared body of knowledge, experiences, and techniques Community – A self-selected group of individuals who care enough about the topic to participate in regular interactions

Figure 1. Communities of Practice have three distinct traits Lean-Agile principles and practices promote cross-functional teams and programs that facilitate value delivery in the enterprise. Similarly, Lean thinking emphasizes organizing people cross-functionally with different skills around a value stream.

1. However, software engineers need to talk with other software engineers; data scientists need to talk with other data scientists; Product Owners need to communicate with their peers from other Agile Teams, and so on.
2. This is critical for leveraging the multiple experiences and different types of practical knowledge available from various people.

That drives craftsmanship and continuous learning (see the Continuous Learning Culture competency article), facilitating the adoption of new methods and techniques. Such domain-focused interactions are often supported by CoPs—informal networks designed specifically for efficient knowledge-sharing and exploration across teams, trains, and the entire organization. Figure 2. Role-based Communities of Practice For example, Scrum Masters/Team Coaches from different Agile teams may form a CoP to exchange practices and experiences in building highly productive Agile teams. As CoPs start to gain acceptance and participation, topic-based communities like those shown in Figure 3 often emerge. Figure 3. Topic-based Communities of Practice The membership of these CoPs can be far more diverse. A CoP on DevOps could attract participants from almost any role in an organization. A CoP with Product Owners and Business Owners could focus on how to write better features optimized for improving the flow of value through the ART.

Another CoP could be formed to improve the organization’s ability to measure flow by building systems to capture and report flow metrics, Software engineers may form a CoP to help members cross-train on low code development platforms when the company adopts that technology as a future strategic direction.

Leaders from ARTs, Solution Trains, and the Portfolio may form a CoP to better understand Value Stream Management and build the practices their enterprise will follow to better manage the Development Value Streams,

What is the sb3 law in Tennessee?

This bill creates an offense for a person who engages in an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.

What is Texas State law SB 8?

table>

An Act relating to abortion, including abortions after detection of an unborn child’s heartbeat; authorizing a private civil right of action.

• Senate President Dan Patrick
• House Speaker Dade Phelan
• Secretary of State vacant
• House Chief Clerk Robert Haney
• Governor Greg Abbott

• 19 voted for
• 12 voted against

• 83 voted for
• 64 voted against
• 2 absent
• 1 present not voting

The Texas Heartbeat Act, Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), is an act of the Texas Legislature that bans abortion after the detection of embryonic or fetal cardiac activity, which normally occurs after about six weeks of pregnancy. The law took effect on September 1, 2021, after the U.S.

Supreme Court denied a request for emergency relief from Texas abortion providers. It is the first time a state has successfully imposed a six-week abortion ban since Roe v. Wade, and the first abortion restriction to rely solely on enforcement by private individuals through civil lawsuits, rather than having state officials enforce the law with criminal or civil penalties.

The act authorizes members of the public to sue anyone who performs or facilitates an illegal abortion for a minimum of $10,000 in statutory damages per abortion, plus court costs and attorneys’ fees. The Texas Heartbeat Act has been subjected to numerous lawsuits in state and federal court, but the statute has thus far withstood each of these court challenges and remains in effect.

Lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the Act have been filed by abortion providers and advocates, as well as the United States Department of Justice, but none of these lawsuits have been able to restore access to post-heartbeat abortions in Texas. The law has been exceedingly difficult to challenge in court because of its unique enforcement mechanism, which bars state officials from enforcing the law and instead authorizes private individuals to sue anyone who performs or assists a post-heartbeat abortion.

Because the law is enforced by private citizens rather than government officials, abortion providers have been unable to obtain relief that will stop private lawsuits from being initiated against them. This produced an end-run around Roe v. Wade, which had established a federal constitutional right to abortion, because the threat of private civil-enforcement lawsuits forced abortion providers to comply with SB 8 despite its incompatibility with the Supreme Court’s then-existing abortion pronouncements.

Even when courts have declared SB 8 unconstitutional, abortion providers have remained in compliance with the Act because it purports to subject individuals to private civil-enforcement lawsuits if they perform or assist a post-heartbeat abortion while an injunction that blocks the law’s enforcement is in effect, if that injunction is later vacated or reversed on appeal.

On October 6, 2021, federal district Judge Robert L. Pitman issued a preliminary injunction that blocked the state of Texas from enforcing the law, which remained in effect until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a stay of Pitman’s order two days later.

Yet Pitman’s order was unable to fully restore access to post-heartbeat abortions in Texas, even during the 48-hour window in which it was in effect, because abortion providers were unwilling to risk the civil liability that would be imposed if Pitman’s injunction were stayed or overturned by a higher court.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to overturn the Fifth Circuit’s stay of Pitman’s ruling, so any post-heartbeat abortions performed in reliance on Pitman’s injunction are subject to private civil-enforcement lawsuits under the terms of SB 8. This has made it difficult for abortion providers to resume services even when they obtain relief from a lower court that pronounces the statute unconstitutional, and it has further frustrated efforts to thwart the statute’s enforcement in court.

• The success of the Texas Heartbeat Act was a major blow to Roe v.
• Wade, as it provided a blueprint for states to outlaw abortion while insulating their laws from effective judicial review,
• This enabled the states to evade Roe v.
• Wade and other Supreme Court rulings that had declared abortion to be a constitutionally protected right.

It also led other states to copy SB 8’s enforcement mechanism and immunize their restrictive abortion laws from judicial review. On May 25, 2022, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed HB 4327 into law, which outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization.

• Because HB 4237, like the Texas Heartbeat Act, is enforced solely through civil lawsuits brought by private citizens, abortion providers were unable to stop the law in court and ceased performing abortions in Oklahoma, even though the Supreme Court had not yet overruled Roe v.
• Wade when the statute took effect.

Idaho has also enacted a six-week abortion ban modeled after the Texas Heartbeat Act, which prevented abortion providers from challenging the constitutionality of the statute in federal court.

What is Texas choice of law?

by Practical Law Commercial Transactions Choice of law clause, also known as a governing law clause, that allows the contract parties to choose the substantive law of Texas to apply to the contract. The parties should review the choice of law clause together with the choice of forum clause, as Texas courts look to both provisions to determine whether to adjudicate the claim and what law to apply.

What is the David’s rule?

‘David’s Law’ requires school districts to include cyberbullying in their district bullying policies and notify a child’s parents if he or she is a victim or alleged aggressor of bullying.

What is Texas SB 1264?

B. Controversy – SB 1264 represents an ambitious attempt to create a comprehensive regulatory system for controlling balance billing. However, it has endured some recent controversy. The controversy centered over new agency rules proposed by the TMB, which consumer advocates believed would turn what is meant to be a narrow exception into a loophole in the bill.

1. SB 1264 creates an exception for health care consumers who would like to be treated by a health care provider outside of their network and are aware that they will be paying a premium for the service.
2. Specifically, SB 1264’s protections do not apply if the medical service is nonemergency, and if the patient receives and signs written notice explaining: (1) the provider and the health plan do not have a contract, (2) the patient’s expected financial responsibility, and (3) the circumstances where the financial responsibility would belong to the patient.

However, many observers argued that the administrative rules created by TMB expanded this loophole far beyond the spirit of the foundational legislation. The rule stated that “an out-of-network provider shall provide written notice and disclosure to an enrollee prior to providing nonemergency health care or medical services to the enrollee.” John Ford, the spokesman for the Texas Association of Health Plans, said that the proposed rule “encourages providers and at worst, it actually requires providers to give a form to patients—this is for non-emergency care—that if signed would waive the surprise billing protection that (SB) 1264 gave them.” If the patient did not sign the waiver, the physician would be able to decide whether or not to continue with the procedure.

Ford was not the only person displeased with the new rules: Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick released a statement saying that “fter passing the strongest ‘surprise billing’ protections in the nation, I am not happy to learn that attempts may be being made at the Texas Medical Board to create a loophole to undermine this important law.” He went on to imply that members of the TMB could find themselves without a job if they support the rule, stating that “it is unlikely the votes would be there to,

approve the reappointment of any member who votes to circumvent the intent of clearly written legislation.” In the face of mounting criticism the TMB relented; they withdrew the rule and passed authority to formulate a rule governing the exception over to the TDI, which has broader jurisdiction over medical providers.

1. The TDI adopted rules governing the exception on an emergency basis on December 20th.
2. The new rule is much different from the one proposed by the TMB and makes it clear that a patient can only waive SB 1264’s balance billing protections when: (1) it is not an emergency, (2) the patient “has a meaningful choice between a participating provider,

and an out-of-network provider,” (3) the patient is not coerced into the choice, and (4) written notice is provided and signed by the patient at least ten business days before the procedure. Meaningful choice is not considered to be present if an out-of-network provider is assigned to the case by another provider or administrator.

• Coercion occurs when a provider attempts to charge a nonrefundable fee prior to the waiver.
• Additionally, the TDI specified that the waiver “must be presented to an enrollee as a stand-alone document and not incorporated into any other document.” These rules provide an arsenal of protections lacking in the initial TMB formulation, and their announcement was met with relief from patient advocates.

However, SB 1264 must still overcome a number of challenges in order to become the powerful consumer-protection bill that its sponsors intended it to be.

What is Texas SB 475?

P&N is now EisnerAmper Effective May 21, 2023, P&N has joined EisnerAmper. Read the full announcement here. Consulting Services • Published 3/15/2022 How SB 475 Changes Data Governance in Texas As privacy, data protection, and data governance continue to be key topics of board room conversation across the globe, many states have introduced-or passed-legislation to protect their citizens and state agencies from the loss of sensitive or personal data.

• In Texas, Senate Bill (SB) 475, passed in 2021, requires Texas state agencies and institutions of higher education to implement sound data management, security, and data governance processes throughout their departments.
• Governor Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 475 into law and the Department of Information Resources (DIR) was tasked with heading this effort to ensure all departments comply.

While SB 475 addresses many new requirements around networks and security, it also requires that all state agencies and institutions with greater than 150 employees appoint a data management officer (DMO), This DMO can be an existing full-time employee or a new hire, although the law does not provide additional funding for the new position.

Establish an agency data governance program to identify the agency’s data assets, exercise authority and management over the agency’s data assets, and establish related processes and procedures to oversee the agency’s data assets; and Coordinate with the agency’s information security officer, the agency’s records management officer, and the Texas State Library and Archives Commission to implement best practices for managing and securing data in accordance with state privacy laws and data privacy classifications:

Ensure the agency’s records management programs apply to all types of data storage media; Increase awareness of and outreach for the agency’s records management programs within the agency; and Conduct a data maturity assessment of the agency’s data governance program in accordance with the requirements established by department rule.

This requirement of a data maturity assessment is continued, in Sec.2054.515 of SB 475:

At least once every two years, each state agency shall conduct an information security assessment of the agency’s:

Information resources systems, network systems, digital data storage systems, digital data security measures, and information resources vulnerabilities; and Data governance program, with participation from the agency’s data management officer, if applicable, and in accordance with requirements established by department rule.

Not later than November 15 of each even-numbered year, the agency shall report the results of the assessment to:

The Department of Information Resources (DIR); and On request, the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the speaker of the house of representatives.

For many state agencies and institutions, the concept of data governance may be new, and perhaps a bit abstract. Additionally, many agencies and institutions employ a federated model for data management that can make data governance a challenge. In higher education, for example, central campus administration typically has very little insight into research data being held at the college of business, making it difficult to understand the institution’s complete data footprint.

In the near term, DIR has adopted the posture that incremental growth is acceptable since there is a reduced window for conducting the first assessment, which is due to the DIR on November 15, 2022. Data governance is not a new concept, and there are many frameworks and tools available that can help your department assess and remediate gaps in your program.

P&N Data Governance and Privacy professionals take a risk-based approach to this assessment to understand your areas of least capability with the highest potential risk for loss, miscategorization, duplication, or data corruption. Most data governance frameworks have a dozen or more domains, so just getting started can be daunting task.

• P&N has helped large Texas state institutions assess their current data governance and data management posture against best practice frameworks.
• We work closely with internal audit, compliance teams, data management officers, and institution leadership to identify key risk areas and provide a road map to a more mature data governance program.

Our assessment methodology leans heavily on the standards leveraged by TAC-202. We can help you grow in incremental compliance with SB 475, better understand your data footprint, and reduce duplication of activities across your agency or institution. Contact us for help assessing how SB 475 may impact your organization, and for support throughout the compliance process.

What is the purpose of safety precautions?

Safety rules in the workplace are important because they protect employees, customers and the company’s brand reputation. Enforcing safety rules can reduce on-the-job accidents and injuries and maximize productivity.

What is the purpose of safety planning?

Para leer en español, haga clic aquí, For many people who have been affected by sexual assault, current and long-term safety can be an ongoing concern. Safety planning is about brainstorming ways to stay safe that may also help reduce the risk of future harm.

Jack Gloop